Venezuela Dictator Hugo Chavez
Remember when Pat Robertson claimed that Dictator Chavez oops~~~ President Chavez~~~ should be "taken out"?
Maybe it wasn't one of Pat's finer moments; but say what you will, the man knows people. He has very good discernment of spirit.
Because Chavez has now publicly made it his goal to destroy the United States. This man is not our friend. He will never be swayed to be our friend.
As an American, I believe we need to make it more difficult for Chavez to destroy us.
Therefore, I will NOT be buying any more gasoline from CITGO.
WHY????
Guess who owns it!
"The company is owned by PDV America, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., the national oil company of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela." ~~Cuban-Venezuelan alliance, bankrolled by oil profits.
No, I'm not in the habit of supporting those regimes whose goal is the destruction of my nation.
The question is, are YOU?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A No Brainer
By John Gibson/ Fox News (Friday, August 26, 2005)
This has been flying around the Internet and I checked it out and it's true.
Remember all the hollering earlier this week about Pat Robertson suggesting the United States assassinate Hugo Chavez ?
Remember the Democrats insisting George W. Bush had to disassociate himself from Pat Robertson, as if Robertson were a member of the cabinet?
Remember Jesse Jackson on the show Wednesday huffing and puffing about the lies and the illegal war and how it's immoral for us to talk about knocking off a foreign leader?
So George Stephanopoulos in 1997 " just after he left the Clinton White House as a close Clinton advisor " wrote in a Newsweek article that Clinton was going to have to think about assassinating Saddam Hussein. {Should have taken care of this despot back in the first Gulf War. We didn't finish the job then.}
Where was the outrage? {No, these people would NOT DARE accuse their liberal democrat party of being WRONG. How dare we to suggest now that they are indeed HYPOCRITES. If a democrat suggests this course of action, then it is righteous; but if a republican suggests it, then we are just war mongerers. Democrats may have some of the people fooled.....but you don't have ALL the people fooled.}
Well there shouldn't have been any outrage because Stephanopoulos was right.
Jesse Jackson didn't answer the question, but if any U.S. leader had a choice between 1,900 dead American soldiers and one dead Saddam Hussein, it's a no brainer.
We have Saddam alive now. Would Jesse Jackson or any leader trade him dead to have 1,900 American soldiers back alive? Easy. You can make that decision in your sleep.
So what was so wrong with what Pat Robertson said? Well it may have been a little premature.
I don't like Hugo, but he's no Saddam yet. ****
{****January 2006, the picture has most definitely changed: Chavez played a major role in the first South American-Arab Summit in Brazil, which attacked both the United States and Israel as the chief enemies of Latin America. In this typical diatribe, Chavez compared capitalism to Count Dracula, Frankenstein, Jack the Ripper and the Boston Strangler, but then added that Capitalists are much worse than those monsters. from CBN News
~~Idiot, doesn't he understand OUR capitalism, the free enterprise system, has made his CITGO RICH??????? I say it again, IDIOT.}
Other than that, the main objection was that Robertson is a conservative and a Christian and since he's a pastor, he shouldn't be talking about shooting people. OK, point well taken.
But the rest of the high dudgeon, the wailing and beating the chest was simply because Robertson represented a way to try to embarrass Bush, even though the president had nothing to do with Robertson or what he said.
Here's a news flash: Stephanopoulos was right in 1997 when he said we might have to off Saddam. Bush was right in the days before the war when he said if Saddam and his sons leave, the war is off. Bush was right when the night before the war he sent bombers to try to bomb Saddam in his sleep.
I'd trade the 1,900 American soldiers for Saddam in a heartbeat.
What's so hard about that decision?
And why is it so hard to admit you'd do it?
That's My Word.
Watch John Gibson weekdays at 5 p.m. ET on "The Big Story".
Top of Page
Maybe it wasn't one of Pat's finer moments; but say what you will, the man knows people. He has very good discernment of spirit.
Because Chavez has now publicly made it his goal to destroy the United States. This man is not our friend. He will never be swayed to be our friend.
As an American, I believe we need to make it more difficult for Chavez to destroy us.
Therefore, I will NOT be buying any more gasoline from CITGO.
WHY????
Guess who owns it!
"The company is owned by PDV America, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., the national oil company of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela." ~~Cuban-Venezuelan alliance, bankrolled by oil profits.
No, I'm not in the habit of supporting those regimes whose goal is the destruction of my nation.
The question is, are YOU?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A No Brainer
By John Gibson/ Fox News (Friday, August 26, 2005)
This has been flying around the Internet and I checked it out and it's true.
Remember all the hollering earlier this week about Pat Robertson suggesting the United States assassinate Hugo Chavez ?
Remember the Democrats insisting George W. Bush had to disassociate himself from Pat Robertson, as if Robertson were a member of the cabinet?
Remember Jesse Jackson on the show Wednesday huffing and puffing about the lies and the illegal war and how it's immoral for us to talk about knocking off a foreign leader?
So George Stephanopoulos in 1997 " just after he left the Clinton White House as a close Clinton advisor " wrote in a Newsweek article that Clinton was going to have to think about assassinating Saddam Hussein. {Should have taken care of this despot back in the first Gulf War. We didn't finish the job then.}
Where was the outrage? {No, these people would NOT DARE accuse their liberal democrat party of being WRONG. How dare we to suggest now that they are indeed HYPOCRITES. If a democrat suggests this course of action, then it is righteous; but if a republican suggests it, then we are just war mongerers. Democrats may have some of the people fooled.....but you don't have ALL the people fooled.}
Well there shouldn't have been any outrage because Stephanopoulos was right.
Jesse Jackson didn't answer the question, but if any U.S. leader had a choice between 1,900 dead American soldiers and one dead Saddam Hussein, it's a no brainer.
We have Saddam alive now. Would Jesse Jackson or any leader trade him dead to have 1,900 American soldiers back alive? Easy. You can make that decision in your sleep.
So what was so wrong with what Pat Robertson said? Well it may have been a little premature.
I don't like Hugo, but he's no Saddam yet. ****
{****January 2006, the picture has most definitely changed: Chavez played a major role in the first South American-Arab Summit in Brazil, which attacked both the United States and Israel as the chief enemies of Latin America. In this typical diatribe, Chavez compared capitalism to Count Dracula, Frankenstein, Jack the Ripper and the Boston Strangler, but then added that Capitalists are much worse than those monsters. from CBN News
~~Idiot, doesn't he understand OUR capitalism, the free enterprise system, has made his CITGO RICH??????? I say it again, IDIOT.}
Other than that, the main objection was that Robertson is a conservative and a Christian and since he's a pastor, he shouldn't be talking about shooting people. OK, point well taken.
But the rest of the high dudgeon, the wailing and beating the chest was simply because Robertson represented a way to try to embarrass Bush, even though the president had nothing to do with Robertson or what he said.
Here's a news flash: Stephanopoulos was right in 1997 when he said we might have to off Saddam. Bush was right in the days before the war when he said if Saddam and his sons leave, the war is off. Bush was right when the night before the war he sent bombers to try to bomb Saddam in his sleep.
I'd trade the 1,900 American soldiers for Saddam in a heartbeat.
What's so hard about that decision?
And why is it so hard to admit you'd do it?
That's My Word.
Watch John Gibson weekdays at 5 p.m. ET on "The Big Story".
Top of Page
posted by conservative~by~nature | 4:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home