Supreme Court Tyrants
from Agape Press
by Brannon S. Howse author of "One Nation Under Man?: The Worldview War Between Christians and the Secular Left" /President and Founder of Worldview Weekend
{conservativebynature's comments enclosed in}
"Dershowitz and his Secular Humanist colleagues {Secular Humanism is anti-God. It is the worship of mankind. Their goal is to completely do away with religion; a Creator and His authority over mankind; and those who worship God~~Christians.} who have and do serve on the High Court are tyrants who have aggressively labored to assault the Constitution by rebelling against the original intent of the framers in order to achieve the godless government they crave.
The decisions of Justice Rehnquist are not taught in law schools because liberal professors of law teach a Secular Humanist worldview application to law and Justice Rehnquist believed in a fixed moral standard as the bases of America's legal system.
Moral relativism has now become the postmodern foundation on which America's courts and law schools are built {and our society} and thus they would never teach the opinions of Justice Rehnquist whose worldview they despise. {Moral relativism: whatever is currently acceptable is ok~~there is NO right, wrong, good, bad, righteous or evil.}
Dershowitz and the secular left are enemies of absolute truth, which is the weapon of freedom and justice instilled in the U.S. Constitution to protect us from the tyrants of the secular left that despise the moral law and a moral law giver {God}that is higher than government.
The tyrants serving on the Supreme Court today would be Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Anthony Kennedy.
While serving as an attorney for the ACLU in 1977, Bader Ginsburg wrote a paper in which she argued that the legal age for sexual activity should be lowered to 12 years old. {The Man-Boy love association believes it should be 8 years of age. The ACLU is supporting this.}
Even before joining the Court, she advocated decisions that 'creatively interpreted clauses of the Constitution ... to accommodate a modern vision' of society. She approved of 'boldly dynamic interpretation, departing radically from the original understanding' of the Constitution. She also believed courts could 'repair' or even 'rewrite' legislation to reach desirable results.
We must replace Sandra Day O'Connor with someone who believes in fixed morality {there is most definitely a good, bad, right, wrong, righteous and evil} so we can continue to fight the humanist worldview of tyrants such as Alan Dershowitz." {And Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter.}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Herein lies the problem. The Supreme Court is not meant to write or rewrite legislation. Their purpose is to carry out the interpretation of the laws of the land.
from The U.S. Constitution online
Article III. - The Judicial Branch
Section 1 - Judicial powers
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
The powers of the Judiciary: the power to try federal cases and interpret the laws of the nation in those cases; the power to declare any law or executive act unconstitutional.
The seperation of powers was done intentially so no one branch could become all powerful. Realistically, it is time to reign in the Supreme Court who has taken more power than they are entitled to. The recent passage of Imminent Domain is one prime example of this.
Legislative Branch's Checks on the Judiciary at U.S. Constitution online
Senate approves federal judges
Impeachment power (House)
Trial of impeachments (Senate)
Power to initiate constitutional amendments
Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme Court
Power to set jurisdiction of courts
Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court
Executive Branch's Checks on the Judiciary
Power to appoint judges
Pardon power
Judicial Branch's Checks on the Legislature
Judicial review
Seats are held on good behavior
Compensation cannot be diminished
Checks on the Executive Branch
Judicial review
Chief Justice sits as President of the Senate during presidential impeachment
We need a strong Constitutionalist on the Supreme Court so that the balance can be restored. These conservative Justices will be the "checks" for the more liberal Justices.
Top of Page
by Brannon S. Howse author of "One Nation Under Man?: The Worldview War Between Christians and the Secular Left" /President and Founder of Worldview Weekend
{conservativebynature's comments enclosed in}
"Dershowitz and his Secular Humanist colleagues {Secular Humanism is anti-God. It is the worship of mankind. Their goal is to completely do away with religion; a Creator and His authority over mankind; and those who worship God~~Christians.} who have and do serve on the High Court are tyrants who have aggressively labored to assault the Constitution by rebelling against the original intent of the framers in order to achieve the godless government they crave.
The decisions of Justice Rehnquist are not taught in law schools because liberal professors of law teach a Secular Humanist worldview application to law and Justice Rehnquist believed in a fixed moral standard as the bases of America's legal system.
Moral relativism has now become the postmodern foundation on which America's courts and law schools are built {and our society} and thus they would never teach the opinions of Justice Rehnquist whose worldview they despise. {Moral relativism: whatever is currently acceptable is ok~~there is NO right, wrong, good, bad, righteous or evil.}
Dershowitz and the secular left are enemies of absolute truth, which is the weapon of freedom and justice instilled in the U.S. Constitution to protect us from the tyrants of the secular left that despise the moral law and a moral law giver {God}that is higher than government.
The tyrants serving on the Supreme Court today would be Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Anthony Kennedy.
While serving as an attorney for the ACLU in 1977, Bader Ginsburg wrote a paper in which she argued that the legal age for sexual activity should be lowered to 12 years old. {The Man-Boy love association believes it should be 8 years of age. The ACLU is supporting this.}
Even before joining the Court, she advocated decisions that 'creatively interpreted clauses of the Constitution ... to accommodate a modern vision' of society. She approved of 'boldly dynamic interpretation, departing radically from the original understanding' of the Constitution. She also believed courts could 'repair' or even 'rewrite' legislation to reach desirable results.
We must replace Sandra Day O'Connor with someone who believes in fixed morality {there is most definitely a good, bad, right, wrong, righteous and evil} so we can continue to fight the humanist worldview of tyrants such as Alan Dershowitz." {And Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter.}
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Herein lies the problem. The Supreme Court is not meant to write or rewrite legislation. Their purpose is to carry out the interpretation of the laws of the land.
from The U.S. Constitution online
Article III. - The Judicial Branch
Section 1 - Judicial powers
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
The powers of the Judiciary: the power to try federal cases and interpret the laws of the nation in those cases; the power to declare any law or executive act unconstitutional.
The seperation of powers was done intentially so no one branch could become all powerful. Realistically, it is time to reign in the Supreme Court who has taken more power than they are entitled to. The recent passage of Imminent Domain is one prime example of this.
Legislative Branch's Checks on the Judiciary at U.S. Constitution online
Senate approves federal judges
Impeachment power (House)
Trial of impeachments (Senate)
Power to initiate constitutional amendments
Power to set courts inferior to the Supreme Court
Power to set jurisdiction of courts
Power to alter the size of the Supreme Court
Executive Branch's Checks on the Judiciary
Power to appoint judges
Pardon power
Judicial Branch's Checks on the Legislature
Judicial review
Seats are held on good behavior
Compensation cannot be diminished
Checks on the Executive Branch
Judicial review
Chief Justice sits as President of the Senate during presidential impeachment
We need a strong Constitutionalist on the Supreme Court so that the balance can be restored. These conservative Justices will be the "checks" for the more liberal Justices.
Top of Page
posted by conservative~by~nature | 10:37 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home